Libertarians cannot be reared

User offline. Last seen 11 years 49 weeks ago.
Copernicus
Number 636
Conspirator for: 14 years 27 weeks
Posted on: October 30, 2011 - 4:51am

Gardner, yes, I’m still listening. Several thoughts on the Osborne podcast: first, as a general observation, for anyone who’s interested, I believe I’ve come up with the succinct one liner for those who use the social contract/public goods argument, how everyone contributed to the wealth of the rich through state provided services. Check out the one note in my latest blog post: www.michaelmcconkey.com . Of course, I could just write it here, but I’d prefer you read the blog post.

Now, onto the matter of child-rearing and parenting philosophy: I hope it is clear that I’m not disagreeing with you or Jason about treating children well. I raised a couple myself, now adults, and I always took the same approach Jason proscribed, simply because I loved them and didn’t want to mistreat them. This should not be confused with the fact that a responsible parent sometimes has to use physical force to restrain a child either for the child’s sake or to protect others from the child. Anyone not willing to do that is not going to be a responsible parent, but that’s very different from hitting a child. That I never condoned. So, I think we’re in agreement on that.

Our disagreement lies in the view expressed by both you and Jason – and much circulated by Stephan M. at Freedomain Radio, who continues to promote this idea, despite my best email efforts: there is no methodology of parenting that will create (or prevent) libertarians. That so many perpetuate this claim in complete contradiction to the scientific evidence is distressing to me. Yes, children do respond to particular parenting styles while in the child-parent dynamic, but, by their mid-20s, genetic dispositions take over. The evidence on this – primarily, though not exclusively, based on twins and adoption studies – is overwhelming. Yes, Jason’s daughter may well turn out to be a libertarian, but this is not due to his parenting style, but due to the genes he passes on to her. The evidence is clear that if she had been adopted as a neo-natal by a family with completely different ethical standards, by the time she was a young adult, the odds are overwhelming that she would have the same views on public affairs as she would have had if raised by Jason.

Anyone interested in exploring this evidence, in a book by a libertarian, should see Bryan Caplan’s Selfish Reasons to Have More Kids. To my mind, though, the real indispensible classic on this is Steven Pinker’s The Blank Slate. Pinker, who explicitly disavows his early childhood flirtation with “Bakunin anarchism” as a result of the violence that ensured during the 1969 police strike in his home town of Montreal, I believe, actually has a deeply repressed libertarian streak running through his thought. (Something I’ll be arguing elsewhere.) In any event, whether any one agrees or not with me on that, the bulk of the empirical and clinical evidence he marshals to make his genetics case against the blank slate idea is impressive -- in the strongest sense of that word..

So, be nice to your children because you love them and, well, they’re your children. And, as Caplan says, one of the very few long term impacts your parenting style can have is whether or not your children remember you fondly. Any delusions that you can turn them into libertarians in the process are misguided according to the science and ethically dubious from a libertarian perspective.  


User offline. Last seen 12 years 16 weeks ago.
Weedwacker
Number 746
Weedwacker's picture
Conspirator for: 13 years 23 weeks
Posted on: November 9, 2011 - 9:35pm #1

I'm glad you posted this.    I'm going to have to go check this out. 

 

One comment though.  I wonder if somebody who is out to "make" their kid anything or "create" their child, by any means whatever, may already be revealing an image they hold of the kid as unworthy of their own autonomy.  I worry that this is an image that child might then carry of themselves, tragically, their whole life.

__________________

"Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe."

Frank Zappa


User offline. Last seen 12 years 16 weeks ago.
Weedwacker
Number 746
Weedwacker's picture
Conspirator for: 13 years 23 weeks
Posted on: November 9, 2011 - 10:51pm #2

OK nevermind my worries are unfounded, the book is making the case that parenting does not affect your kid's happiness, self-esteem, or health.  These assertions really seem to clash with alot of other reseach.  I'm skeptical of the way he's reporting this.  Have you pulled any of these studies and read them?


User offline. Last seen 12 years 3 weeks ago.
Nich
Number 632
Conspirator for: 14 years 29 weeks
Posted on: November 10, 2011 - 4:44pm #3

User offline. Last seen 9 years 22 weeks ago.
FUR3jr
Number 468
FUR3jr's picture
Conspirator for: 15 years 29 weeks
Posted on: November 10, 2011 - 5:48pm #4

I want my kids to be libertarians.  I myself had decided I was a libertarian by the time I was 16, even though I really didn't know what that meant, or how it would evolve in me as time has passed.

I encourage my kids to think for themselves, and to face the natural consequences of their actions, by not imposing external penalities (grounding, time out, corporal punishment are not something I do).  We have conversations, which I admit are, more often than not, lectures on some theory on ethics that I've been thinking about.  I want my kids to be like me, but I know that they will do what they want, despite what I think.

Tomorrow is Veterans day, and the school where they attend classes is putting on an assembly for veterans day.  I've been invited to attend.  This display of jingoism really really disturbs me, but my kids really want to participate in this.  I will attend, but I won't be singing the national anthem, or pledging allegiance to the flag, to be sure.  I may do as Jesse Ventura suggests, and turn my back on the flag, and raising my fist (the black power salute).

The republic, for which is stands, depends upon your perspective (as S. Molynieux suggests).  For many people in the arab world, it stands for the death of members of your family, friends, and neighbors, or the funding of governments that are oppressing you.  To me, and to a growing number of people residing within the republic's territorial boundaries, it stands for all these things, and for the long and storied oppression of dissent, and the destruction of ancient civilizations and cultures.

When I was in elementary school, I won the Citizenship Award multiple times per year.  It was a source of great pride to me then, but as time goes by, I consider making the very long trek back to Ezra H. Baker Elementary School, and returning those awards, as they have become a symbol of my enslavement.

In an unjust world, the righteous belong in jail.