We must reiterate a point.

Some people have depicted opposition to the "contraceptive coverage" portion of the medical fascism law as mean, cruel, standing in the way of a "right" of women to have health problems covered. That misses the point. The point is that the medical fascism law FORCES, MANDATES private individuals/businesses to have to buy health insurance for their employees which will include in it something which the business owners find morally repugnant. Why force them? Why not leave them alone?

What if a pro-choice organization were forced by the government to pay for the religious beliefs of a born-again Christian working for it? Would that be fine? Of course not.

... that his recommendation is to continue to have the ECB print money, and then channel it into the spending systems of the various already out-of-control nations like Spain, France, Greece, Portugal, and Holland?

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-sees-emerging-consensus-economic-fix-2259433...

Things are going to unravel there even more rapidly during the summer.

Useable (real) capital is going to flee, and businesses will not start in those nations, but will move to others, if there are a few left to try to start in this inflationary environment.

Be Seeing You!

How small is small enough for a transaction to escape federal 'approval'? And since one's time spent on work effects the time he spends in all other aspects of his life, we can see that it is all one continuum, so should the feds step in to tell how we spend our free time, and make that subject to their approval? After all, it could effect our business and vice-versa. It's an endless problem, because they don't realize that our work-lives and our non-work-lives are all one thing: Our lives. As long as we are leading our lives peacefully, what concern is it of others?

"The Glorious End" - P.G.G.

Some days you just can't see

The vision of the humble, that the forest's made of trees.

There's a bit of shame, for each one's name

The boxes beside, the laying of blame.

Old stodgy, old fun

Fake jewelry, makeup run

Fierce eye-gaze, rank sweat glaze

They're running, running, running

For the Glorious End.

Sometimes it comes to me

The recitation, beautiul mantras, three.

For a whole of us, for a nation's name

Any act is excused, no laying of blame.

"Old Glory", old one

Fake jewelry, my son

Wear it proudly, for all to see

Hear that knocking? It's the feds at your backdoor...

http://rt.com/news/fbi-legislation-surveillance-internet-648/

Be Seeing You!

The delay was probably caused by their sheer dearth of complaints. Right?

http://www.propublica.org/article/tsa-reveals-passenger-complaints-four-...

Be Seeing You!

But, but... Pulp-like substances!

(A little reference to National Lampoon's "That's Not Funny, That's Sick" album)

Enjoy!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/people-not-labor-force-soar-522000-labor-f...

Have you bought precious metals yet?

Be Seeing You!

Good to see. Let's apply pressure to the Senate ASAP.

http://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-launches-campaign-to-end-the-tsa/

Be Seeing You!

For anyone who listened closely to Pelosi's comments at the time, this revelation that she lied about being aware of Waterboarding comes as no surprise. It's more than mildly irksome, though, to wonder why this former CIA cat had to wait until he had a BOOK for sale to go public about her lie. Ahh, transparent gubment... http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ex-cia-counterterror-chief-pelosi-lied-about-waterboarding/2012/04/30/gIQAQFGtrT_story.html

Be Seeing You!

No kidding.

Seems the pop media finally caught up, after years of this going on.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-...

Be Seeing You!

Where are the leftists on this?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/white-house-approv...

Be Seeing You!

Uh-oh.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/german-court-rules-against-youtube-copyright-te...

Be Seeing You!

Hey, everyone! I hope I can engender your support for a very talented friend. Her name is Joylynne Chrislan and her latest film, "Capital Punishment", has been entered in the Student Life and Leadership Film Festival. You can view it and the others here: http://www.slccfilmfestival.blogspot.com/p/drama.html and then you can follow the rules for non-students to send in your votes. I hope I can entice you to watch hers, see the quality, and then offer her your vote of support! Do it before the close of voting on the 20th!

Cute story. Without getting parental consent, without even notifying the parents, Sacramento cops march into a school, pull kids out of class, and get their DNA. But that infringement of the 4th Amendment wasn't enough. They then interrogated the kids without notification or parental consent, and his arse Deputy has the classless gall to say that they were "interviews" not "interrogations" and that the so-called "interiews" were all "consensual". Hey, fool, according to your own LAWS, kids uner 18 aren't of majority age. They can't LEGALLY give their consent. This city should be sued until it's bankrupt (it probably already is), and the cops involved should be fired, and held liable for damages demanded by the parents.

Now, we understand their deference to those on-hand, and their desire to let those on-hand make decisions they believe are important for security, but this exposes a very large problem with gubment-run justice systems: they have little room for nuance and attenuation based on custsomer desires. It's often one-size-fits-all. Market-based justics systems would work better and allow for voluntary consideration of what levels of searches people desired for their justice/security.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/11682964-418/supreme-court-strip-sea...

Be Seeing You!

Many of the justices seem unimpressed with the arguents provided in support of the idea that the federal government can FORCE citizens to have to buy health insurance. They seem to rail against the idea that people can be compelled to buy something. They are correct. But will they apply that standard to taxation, which every day forces people to buy things they don't want? That's doubtful.

We will discuss this on the radio program tonight! Tune in from 10:06 to midnight, eastern US time!

http://www.latimes.com/health/la-na-court-healthcare-20120328,0,339163.s...

Be Seeing You!

Ahh yes. Sen Reid has been grabbing money for this "high-speed rail" boondoggle for many a moon. Now, it looks like he'll get even more, thanks to the current Administration planning a 4.9 BILLION loan for the project.

Here's the story. Consider the economics of trying to inject "wealth and business" into one politically favored area, versus taking it from everyplace else. This deserves some coverage on the Liberty Conspiracy Audios, live or podcast versions!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46849661/ns/us_news-life/#.T2-YPtmAoTB

Here's a response for Mr. Reid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NT-MbRtTo14&feature=related

Be Seeing You!

What follows is my entry into the 2011 edition of the Foundation for Economic Education's Eugene S. Thorpe Writing Competition.  

According to an e-mail I received on March 7, 2012

[quote=Foundation for Economic Education]

So the government takes the money, and then, in order to get it back (admittedly, many get more back than they could have had taken), the victims of the theft must pass drug tests. Interesting...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/08/drugs-tests-jobless-arizona-ste...

Be Seeing You!

Not like there are choices in the publishing industry or anything...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/08/us-apple-ebooks-idUSBRE82715J2...

We'll discuss this on Liberty Conspiracy Radio tonight!

Be Seeing You!